Feed on
Posts
Comments

unPlanned

Just yesterday, I said I was going to read Abby Johnson’s Unplanned: The Dramatic True Story of a Former Planned Parenthood Leader’s Eye-Opening Journey across the Life Lineand that I looked forward to how it would inspire me.

It has done much more than that. Much more.  

In the note from the publisher, Fr. Joseph Fessio, S. J. Editor of Ignatius Press, says “This book will become the pro-life classic of the early twenty-first century.”

He is absolutely correct.

I try not to play things up or make them too big when recommending someone read/watch something I’ve immensely enjoyed. So I won’t share too much about Abby’s story. But I will tell you, urge you, and almost plead with you: Read this. If you are pro-life, or think you are-read Abby Johnson’s story.  If you are personally against abortion and want to see abortions decrease but still are pro-choice and honestly care deeply for the rights and health of women-read this.

This is not your average pro-life vs. pro-choice book. I will share three important parts from unplanned here but hope you all read the whole thing on your own.

First, this part is from A Note from Abby Johnson that really tells you the tone and perspective of this book.

“I reveal my story not because I am proud of it. I am not. But my thinking and choices are not unlike those of so many people I have encountered. And until we each set aside our own preferences for how we wish others would think and behave, or how we assume others think and behave, we won’t be able to understand those with whom we differ in order to engage in real dialogue and discover truth.

Oh, how we like to vilify our opponents-from both sides. How easy to assume that those on ‘our’ side are right and wise and good; how those on ‘their’ side are treacherous and foolish and deceptive. I have found right and good and wisdom on both sides. I have found foolishness and treachery and deception on both sides as well. I have experienced how good intentions can be warped into poor choices no matter what the side…We all long for a story that shows that ‘our’ side is right and good, and ‘their’ side is wrong and bad, don’t we? But I testify that there is good and right and wrong on both sides of the fence. And even more shocking-we have far more in common with the ‘other’ side than we might imagine.”

And then, she asks a question of the reader:

“Are you ready to look through the fence and see goodness, compassion, generosity, and self-sacrifice on the other side?”

The second excerpt I want to share is how Abby’s understanding and perspective of the pro-life movement changed once she realized Planned Parenthood was not what she thought it was. Throughout the years she was there, Abby saw the pro-lifers on the other side of the fence go from being ‘stone-throwers’ to people of gentleness and kindness and mutual respect and care for the women going into the clinic, either as clients or workers. It was their relentless love that eventually rescued Abby and set her free. In the days and weeks after Abby left Planned Parenthood she thought a lot and learned a lot about what the pro-life vision and Coalition for Life’s vision was really about.

“The more we talked, the more I came to understand that their vision for providing care and resources for these women was incredibly similar to my own, but that their vision to truly care for a woman went far beyond her immediate circumstances. They cared about each woman as a whole person-an eternal person-in the context of her family, her spiritual needs, her long-range physical and emotional health. They offered solutions that would enhance a woman’s life over the long term.”

And the last important section I have to share her is the climax of Abby’s story. Or maybe it’s the beginning. It is long, probably verging on copyright issues, but I’m going to share it anyway because…well you’ll see.

Abby’s final turning point moment came after she’d been working for Planned Parenthood for eight years. As part of her job, she had scheduled and counseled women for abortions but had never participated directly in the actual abortion (she often used this thinking while she worked there as justification that she was not part of abortions). But on this day, she was asked to help in the abortion because the visiting doctor needed to do an ultrasound-guided abortion and needed Abby’s help to hold the ultrasound probe. (She explained that some abortion doctors use this method since it is ‘safer’ since it lets the doctor see exactly what is going on inside the uterus, therefore there is less chance of perforating the uttering wall, one of the risks of abortion.) Those next ten minutes would “shake the foundation of [her] values and change the course of [her] life.” This is how she described what happened.

“I had occasionally performed diagnostic ultrasounds for clients before. It was one of the services we offered to confirm pregnancies and estimate how far along they were. The familiarity of preparing for an ultrasound soothed my uneasiness at being in this room. I applied the lubricant to the patient’s belly, then maneuvered the ultrasound probe until her uterus was displayed on the screen and adjusted the probe’s position to capture the image of the fetus.

I was expecting to see what I had seen in past ultrasounds. Usually, depending on how far along the pregnancy was and how the fetus was turned, I’d see a leg, or the head, or some partial image of the torso, and would need to maneuver a bit to get the best possible image. But this time, the image was complete. I could see the entire, perfect profile of a baby.

Just like Grace at twelve weeks, I thought, surprised, remembering my very first peek at my daughter, three years before, snuggled securely inside my womb. The image now before me looked the same, only clearer, sharper. The detail startled me. I could clearly see the profile of the head, both arms, legs, and even tiny fingers and toes. Perfect.

And just as quickly, the flutter of the warm memory of Grace was replaced with a surge of anxiety. What am I about to see? My stomach tightened. I don’t want to watch what is about to happen.

I suppose that sounds odd coming from professional who’d been running a Planned Parenthood clinic for two years, counseling women in crises, scheduling abortions, reviewing the clinic’s monthly budget reports, hiring and training staff. But odd or not, the simple fact is, I had never been interested in promoting abortion. I’d come to Planned Parenthood eight years before, believing that its purpose was primarily to prevent unwanted pregnancies, thereby reducing the number of abortions. That had certainly been my goal. And I believed that Planned Parenthood saved lives-the lives of women who, without the services provided by this organization, might resort to some back-alley butcher. All of this sped through my mind as I carefully held the probe in place.

“Thirteen weeks,” I heard the nurse say after taking measurements to determine the fetus’s age.

“Okay,” the doctor said, looking at me, “just hold the probe in place during the procedure so I can see what I’m doing.”

The cool air of the exam room left me feeling chilled. My eyes still glued to the image of this perfectly formed baby, I watched as a new image entered the video screen. The cannula-a straw-shaped instrument attached to the end of the suction tube-had been inserted into the uterus and was nearing the baby’s side. It looked like an invader on the screen, out of place. Wrong. It just looked wrong.

My heart sped up. Time slowed. I didn’t want to look, but I didn’t want to stop looking either. I couldn’t not watch. I was horrified, but fascinated at the same time, like a gawker slowing as he drives past some horrific automobile wreck-not wanting to see a mangled body, but looking all the same.

My eyes flew to the patient’s face; tears flowed from the corners of her eyes. I could see she was in pain. The nurse dabbed the woman’s face with a tissue.

“Just breathe,” the nurse gently coached her. “Breathe.”

“It’s almost over,” I whispered. I wanted to stay focused on her, but my eyes shot back to the image on the screen.

At first, the baby didn’t seem aware of the cannula. It gently probed the baby’s side, and for a quick second I felt relief. Of course, I thought. The fetus doesn’t feel pain. I had reassured countless women of this as I’d been taught by Planned Parenthood. The fetal tissue feels nothing as it is removed. Get a grip, Abby. This is a simple, quick medical procedure. My head was working hard to control my responses, but I couldn’t shake an inner disquiet that was quickly mounting to horror as I watched the screen.

The next movement was the sudden jerk of a tiny foot as the baby started kicking, as if trying to move away from the probing invader. As the cannula pressed in, the baby began struggling to turn and twist away. It seemed clear to me that the fetus could feel the cannula and did not like the feeling. And then the doctor’s voice broke through, startling me.

“Beam me up, Scotty,” he said lightheartedly to the nurse. He was telling the nurse to turn on the suction-in an abortion the suction isn’t turned on until the doctor feels he has the cannula in exactly the right place.

I had a sudden urge to yell, “Stop!” To shake the woman and say, “Look at what is happening to your baby! Wake up! Hurry! Stop them!”

But even as I thought those words, I looked at my own hand holding the probe. I was one of ‘them’ performing this act. My eyes shot back to the screen again. The cannula was already being rotated by the doctor, and now I could see the tiny body violently twisting with it. For the briefest moment it looked as if the baby were being wrung like a dishcloth, twirled and squeezed. And then the little body crumpled and began disappearing into the cannula before my eyes. The last thing I saw was the tiny, perfectly formed backbone sucked into the tube, and then everything was  gone. And the uterus was empty. Totally empty.

…And right there, standing beside the table, my hand on the weeping woman’s belly, this thought came from deep within me:

Never again! Never again.”

Share

There are so many issues in our country and in the world. They are all related and of course all of society’s ills can be blamed on our fallen nature.

Still, the one issue that I will never accept or ‘get over’ is abortion. Yes there are so many other injustices against human life but this one, to me, is the worst of all since it intentionally kills a life in its very beginning. What’s most amazing and sad to me though is how this crime against life is not only legal but for some it has become an acceptable ‘necessessary evil’ for the ‘common good’ of all women. (I could go on a major tangent about ‘necessary evils’ and the’ common good’ but I’ll save that for later)

It is said to be ‘for women’ but it is, in truth, 100% against women.

Sometimes it seems like an impossible hope that legal abortion will end one day, at least in this country. But, there was a time when no one thought it possible for such a thing to be called a ‘legal right’. I suppose there is hope we could swing back the other way someday.

But if that ever happens, it will not erase the past. The debris left after this passes will not be pretty. The survivors, the women, men, children and families left in the aftermath will still be there. They are there now.

 I will rejoice and praise God for every law that passes that restricts abortions and maybe, miraculously, even one that forbids them. However, as much as I want abortion to end, I cannot ignore the need to bring healing to the innocent victims, the unborn babies and their families who never met them. And we cannot expect this to happen overnight. It will take a complete change in our current culture’s philosophy.

With a big picture in mind, this will have to happen one by one and step by step. I just picked up the new book Unplanned: The Dramatic True Story of a Former Planned Parenthood Leader’s Eye-Opening Journey across the Life Line by Abby Johnson. I’ve only read the first couple pages and already cried a few times. Not because of pain or sorrow (though I will go there in this book) but because of rejoicing in God’s amazing and never-ending mercy.

Now that I am done reading Sarah Palin’s America by Heart, I’m looking forward to how Abby Johnson’s story will move me and inspire me and remind me that this is a fight worth fighting, until the end.

On that note, I will share here some excerpts and quotes from America by Heart about the issue of abortion and how it applies to America and feminism now and in the past and how America can and is growing more and more pro-life. I was surprised to read about the distinct pro-life convictions the womens’ rights leaders lived their lives and fought the battles for.

“Modern feminism has for decades equated being pro-abortion with being pro-woman. In the years following Roe v. Wade, we were told that the issue was no longer open for debate and that we should just get over it and ‘move on’.”

“American women and men haven’t been able to get over the stirrings of the consciences or move on from an issue that cuts to the heart of who we are as a people. Affirming the dignity and worth of every innocent human life and defending the defenseless are fundamental American values.”

“Liberal feminism tells American women that they can’t value life and call themselves women. But more and more women are rejecting this cynical message.”

“Strangely, many feminists seem to want to tell tese young women that they’re not capable, that you can’t give your child life and still pursue your dreams. Their message is: “Women, you are not strong enough or smart enough to do both. You are not capable.”

“The new feminism is telling women they are capable and strong. And if keeping a child isn’t possible, adoption is a beautiful choice. It’s about empowering women to make real choices, not forcing them to accept false ones. It’s about compassion and letting these sacred young women know that there will be some help there for them to raise their children in those less-than-ideal circumstances.”

“The women’s movement used to be about honoring for women the same God-given rights that our country honored for men. It used to be about dignity and hope. It used to be about respecting women by respecting their choices-whether it is to be a nuclear engineer or a stay-at-home mom-not denigrating them when they aren’t sufficiently like men. And it used to be about respecting women’s unique role in creating and sustaining life.

“Liberal feminists like to accuse women who don’t agree with them of trampling on the legacy of the women who fought before us…”

In truth, these women were advocates for life. Susan B. Anthony saw the fight for the rights of the unborn as part of the broader fight for women’s rights. “Sweeter even than to have had the joy of children of my own has it been for me to help bring about a better state of things for mothers generally, so that their unborn little ones could not be willed away from them.”

Alice Paul, the author of the original Equal Righs Amendment in 1923, “Abortion is the ultimate exploitation of women.”

Unless you are talking about Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, who was was an advocate of the Nazie-style eugenics, culling the human race of its ‘undesirables.’ Sanger advocated birth control to keep the ‘unfit’ from reproducing-particularly blacks.

“…the pro-life movement is strongly pro-woman, and pro-woman Americans are increasingly pro-life. These women and men of conscience are the rightful heirs t the foremothers who fought for our rights at the turn of the last century. These warrior souls show their dedication not only to women, but to the weakest among us: those with special needs, women without anyone to turn to, and children without a voice. They run the pregnancy resource centers, the counseling hotlines, the foster care facilities, the adoption services, and countless other outreach programs that offer compassionate assistance and friendship to women who are struggling.”

“…being open to life and family is beautiful; …it creates something beautiful that can enrich their [parents'] lives in ways they never dreamed possible.”

Share

As I said yesterday, I’ve learned a lot about politics and politicians and how this affects our American legislative process.

Today is President’s Day and throughout the day I’ve thought about how much our country has changed and how our presidents have changed throughout the years. We’ve gone from George Washington, who was more of a military leader, to President Obama, who leads the country more with words than by the sword.

As our country has grown and developed vastly since Washington in many ways besides just our numbers, so have our expectations and ideals in our president and legislators. A huge shift has occurred in the recent years and people seem to  care more about what a president looks like and says than about what he or she does.

In America by Heart : Reflections on Family, Faith, and Flag, Sarah Palin shares Crystal Brilliant Snow Jenne’s  (Alaska’s first woman to run for the Territorial House of Representatives and achieve success in 1940)  idea of what a good legislature really needs.

“I firmly believe that what is needed in our Legislature today is a real representative of the people whose qualifications are honesty, common sense, knowledge of conditions, aggressiveness, independence, and fearlessness, together with business ability and experience…”

I couldn’t agree more. Presidential elections are coming up again and soon we’ll be bombarded, once again with ads and phone calls asking us to make a decision about who we want to be our next national leader and represent our country.

I hope that in those choices, there will be a candidate who exhibits those qualities Jenne highlighted. In a dream world, this candidate would be someone who:

1. Loves God

2. Loves their family

 3. Loves their Country (as the founders set it up to be).

I hope there is someone out there who isn’t afraid to do all those 3 things (in that order) while accepting the duty of representing and leading our diverse and beautiful country. I hope there is someone who can make important decisions and support laws and actions that:

1. Uphold and defend the dignity and importance of every life

2. Uplift and encourage individual liberty

3. Empower and allow all Americans to seek and work hard for happiness and fulfillment in their own lives and in the lives of others.

More specifically, I don’t want a superhero President who does everything for everyone but rather makes sure individuals and states and cities and towns can do their jobs and live their lives.

And most importantly, I hope there is someone who can do all of that when everyone is watching and when no one is watching.

What do you think a good president should be like? If you could pick your own  presidential candidate-who would it be?

Share

Politics 101

I have learned a lot these past few weeks about politics and the American legislative process and the people who represent us, the people. Some lessons are new while others are ones I knew but had hoped were not true.

  1. Never assume anything. But if you must, always assume a person is innocent until proven guilty. If they are guilty or if an assumption is true, decide if it is necessary to share the information and decide how to do it with respect to the person’s dignity.
  2. The issue is never the real issue.
  3. What is logical and obvious to me is not always logical and obvious to others, even if it is true.
  4. Any attempts to force someone to see an obvious and logical truth will only end in failure.
  5. People should do what is right because it is the right thing to do.
  6. Sadly, most people will do the right thing only when it is right for them.
  7. The minority does the majority of the work.
  8. And the majority does the majority of the complaining.  
  9. Respect for others supersedes the need to be right.
  10. It turns out that prayerful kindness, honesty, self-respect, and respect for others is more powerful than angry force and intimidation after all.
Share

On that note, as I’m reading through America by Heart : Reflections on Family, Faith, and Flag, I will share some excerpts I find noteworthy. Most of my opinions of Sarah Palin have been formed after reading her words or watching her words in their full context. If you can get past the media surface image of her, you might actually be inspired by some of the things she shares and find that she is actually quite intelligent. (would you please stop rolling your eyes?)

Today I am reading about American Exceptionalism. Here are some goodies from the chapter.

“You’ve probably heard a term being used by those who belive America is a special nation with a special role in the world: American exceptionalism. It may sound kind of cocky and arrogant to some people. But what do we mean when we say America is an exception country? We’re not saying we’re better than anyone else, or that we have the right to tell people in other countries how to live their lives. When we say America is exceptional we’re saying we are the lucky heirs to a unique set of beliefs and national qualites, and that we need to preserve and value those beliefs. We’re saying America is a model to the world, not a bully to the world, or responsible for the world.”

“The knee-jerk tendency on the part of some to run down America and accuse her fans of being mindless hillbillies is getting old. On the other hand, I’m not interested in closing my eyes to our country’s problems. There has to be a middle ground, a way of talking about America that shows we are proud of her greatness but not blind to her flaws.”

She goes on to quote the Frenchman Alexis de Tocqueville’s explanation and observation of America’s exceptionalism. “The position of the Americans…quite exceptional, and it may be believed that no democratic people will ever be placed in a similar one.”

And also quoted sociologist Charles Murray explanation of how other countries know there is something different about us over here. “American exceptionalism is not just something that Americans claim for themselves. Historically, Americans have been different as apeople, even peculiar, and everyone around the world have recognized it.”

Lastly, Palin goes onto remember that “…humility is a virtue, we recognize and value what makes America unique, but that doesn’t give us an excuse to be boastful. Neither, though, does it demand that we owe the world an apology for our succes and our leadership.” She drives this point home for me with an analogy to a scene from The Incredibles that I, coincidentally, also had thought of when I watched it.

“Dash, the son in the superhero family, who is a super-fast runner, wants to try out for the track team at school. His mom claims it won’t be fair. ‘Dad always said our powers were nothing to be ashamed of. Our powers made us special!’ Dash objects. When his mom answers with the politically correct rejoinder ‘Everyone is special, Dash!’ Dash mutters, ‘Which is another way of saying no one is.’”

Share

Sarah

Ok, this draft has been sitting here long enough. I’ve been wanting to write about her for a while but kept putting it off and now I’m just going to ‘join the crowd’ for a while and talk about who everyone else is talking about 24/7. That’s right–Sarah Palin. (don’t roll your eyes at me, please)

During the 2008 campaign, I admit that I was not tremendously excited about McCain but he was still a much better option than Obama and had more of  chance than any other better candidates. So I went along as best as I could, though rather half-heartedly.

But the moment I saw Sarah, my heart leaped and I thought-now there is someone who I can get excited about.

On that stage, I saw a confident woman, a (happy) wife, and a mother (of more than 2 children!). It only got better when I learned she was pro-life, a true conservative, definitely pro-America, and most importantly, being all those things at the same time and not ashamed or afraid to admit to it. In fact, she was refreshingly confident and proud of being all the above. It was so unusual to see someone like her with such spunk and zeal in such a huge spotlight.  

Apparently, I wasn’t the only one who was stunned by such a rare display. To this day, the media still can’t get enough of her and mention her name every chance they get. (I bet if Chris Farley were still around he could use her name in a skit like he did with “El Nino”) She is loved by many and hated by many. Some look up to her and set her on high pedastools, and others look down and want to smash her into the ground. (hopefully not literally)

I’ve read her first book, Going Rogue: An American Life, and just started America by Heart : Reflections on Family, Faith, and Flag. After reading Going Rogue, the first thing I thought was: “Wow, people and the media really have no idea who this woman really is.” The second thing I thought was: “Wow, this woman really loves America..hmmm….maybe I should too.”  And then I had a sudden urge to sing Lee Greenwood’s, I’m proud to be an American song. (don’t laugh, I’m serious!) That might sound corny, but after reading the book, Sarah Palin reminded me that this country really is exceptional and I should be proud to be an American and not ashamed or apologetic about it (as is the current popular trend).

Two years later, I’m not sick of Sarah Palin like many others are. She continues to inspire me to work harder, live bolder, educate myself about what makes this country really great, and not be afraid to do what is necessary to defend my God-given rights that our country was founded on and promised to protect. In a big way, she helped me stop whining and get my butt off the couch and become an active and responsible citizen.

The question of whether she would make a good president is a good one, and one that we may or may not have to decide. I think it all depends on what a person’s idea of a good president is.  Is it someone like George Washington- more of a military leader? Or is it someone like Obama-more like a spokesperson and crowdpleaser? Or is it someone who will inspire the country to be great by focusing on our strengths, instead of our weaknesses? Or is it someone like Ronald Reagan-who did a little bit of all of the above?

I’m curious if she will run for president or not. I know many hope not so they can stop hearing about her. I’m not sick of her, but I am sick of the relentless degrading name-calling Palin bashing that never. ever. stops. The past 2 years has been an extraodinary show of the media’s power over someone’s reputation. They can either break you or make you. For those who love Sarah, the constant media attention has only fueled their love and admiration for her. For those who hate her, it has only added more hatred and bitterness to their hearts and tongues. They blame her for inciting violence, yet seem to have nothing better to do with their lives than think of more insulting and hurtful words and techniques to bring her and her innocent family down. It makes my jaw drop every time I give in and read through comments on articles about her. I can’t believe how nasty and horrible people can be about someone that they don’t even know. It’s ridiculous. They treat her like she isn’t even human. I guess they don’t think she deserves to be treated as such if she doesn’t conform to their ideas of a woman, a mother, a wife, or an American.

One thing I think everyone can admire is her perserverence. It’s impressive, to say the least, that she hasn’t quit even after all the attacks and insane accusations.

It’s one thing to disagree with someone but I mean, seriously, there are kinder ways to do it than what has been spewed out about her and her family.

So there you have it. I like Sarah Palin. I don’t agree with everything she does or says, but I am grateful for the ways she has inspired me to be a better and more responsible American. I don’t expect everyone to like her like I do. But I’m not ashamed to admit that I do either.

Share

The subject of torture and interrogation has been on my mind for a while. There are many issues which I am without-a-doubt convicted on (abortion, same-sex marriage, etc) but this issue of torture is one I’m still ‘in process’ on. (I should just name my blog In Process on the Issues.)

I will devote more time to the issue soon hopefully maybe, with excerpts from Church teaching on the subject. But not yet.

Joshua Mercer at Catholic Vote’s Blog  wrote about his disappointment of Bush’s approval of waterboarding.

“There are many pro-life Catholics out there that seem to have no problems with waterboarding. They acknowledge that Catholic teaching is crystal clear: Torture is immoral. But they maintain that waterboarding does not constitute torture. I think this doesn’t make sense if you understand exactly what waterboarding is.”

So I’d like to engage you my readers and friends, if you’re still out there, in a conversation about this so I can develop my thoughts more.

Questions: Do you believe waterboarding is torture?  Do you believe there is ever a place and time such techniques can be used justifiably?

Hypothetically: If your child was kidnapped and you caught one of the kidnappers,  would you use torture intense interrogation methods to make the kidnapper tell you where your child was?

Share

In my third post on Immigration, The Human Factor I used the life boat analogy to further explain why it is important to regulate migration into this country. After a really great conversation on the topic with some really wonderful friends, I realized this analogy was open to a different interpretation that I originally did not see and do not completely agree with. It could convey that America should put a permanent cap on how many are allowed in and while I could see how that could be necessary I don’t think we are there yet.  Can anyone think of a better analogy?

This wonderful country, the U.S. of A, is the greener side for many. I believe this is because of our strong founding principles and constitution, America’s strong work ethic and entrepreneurship, and America’s incredible generosity.

It is a land of great opportunity and we should allow others a chance for those same opportunities. I still believe, though, that the process for how others are allowed in needs to be better regulated. And I stick to what I said before and say that we also can’t just let anyone in.  We do have an abundance of land and opportunity to share but we can’t be reckless in how we share it or there will be nothing good left to share.

I don’t know what the solution is exactly. And there is no one solution. Since we’re talking about human beings, making policies for immigration is very tricky. But we need to focus on making policies that are just and ‘fair’ for law-abiding American citizens who are already here and for those who have honestly want to immigrate here. They should not come here illegally. Illegal immigrants that are already here should not receive special incentives, rewards or benefits like driver’s licenses, social security benefits, voting privileges, etc. But they also should not receive abuse, denial of emergency health care and other basic necessities if they can pay or if not at free clinics or through non-profit organizations.

They come here for work; to support themselves or their family. But really, an illegal immigrant should not be allowed permanent employment somewhere in the country if they do not intend to set up a legal status (temporary worker, resident, citizen).  Any other country would say the same. But on the other hand it cuts into our hearts, or at least it should, to just turn away a person in need. I don’t believe they come here with the intention to ‘steal jobs away’ but they are desperate for a way to provide for their family. They are willing to do whatever it takes to do that. Even if it means sacrificing their own dignity. And that is a shame. They deserve better than that. They deserve a chance at a better life. But if they can’t come here legally, and they are forced to come here illegally, they’ll end up trading one bad life for one with a new set of different problems.

So what is the solution?

Whatever it is, policies should focus on principle, integrity, respect, dignity, compassion, justice, and a reasonable assessment of what we truly can or cannot provide. We can’t pit illegal immigrants against US citizens like this distasteful ad portrays. But we also can’t pit honest American citizens and legal residents who’ve worked so hard to get what they rightfully have against those who come here illegally.

Share

Tomorrow

A day

of history

November 4, 2008

CHANGE

February 17, 2009

787 billion dollars

March 11, 2009

$3.6 trillion budget  

March 21st, 2010

Government controlled ‘health care’ for “all”… 

July 15th 2010

Government controlled  ’free’ market

FUNDAMENTAL

9.6% (or more) unemployment rate

13 Trillion dollar national debt

 CHANGE

Yesterday.

Tomorrow is a new day.

Not for change; democrats, republicans, or independents

not for perfection

-for restoration.

-for “we the people”

Let every vote count. Let every voice be heard.

VOTE

“We are here! We are here!”

 

“Tomorrow it’s our turn to vote against them and put our government back on the side of the people. This is our chance to rebuke their big government power grab, reject their unwanted “fundamental transformation” of America, and start the process of repealing this bill before it buries us under a mountain of debt.” Sarah Palin

Share

A hot topic I’ve wanted to write about for a while but keep pushing aside for who knows why. It’s a HUGE issue and one that could never be fully discussed or encapsulated in one blog post. Monica touched on it here. For today, I will invite you to read Catholic Exchange’s “The Practice of Medicine Cannot Be Isolated from the Truth!” by Mark Armstrong.  Please do read it.

Here are some of the highlights from the article I will focus on:

“The practice of medicine cannot be isolated from the truth….in every truth there is something more than we expected.  And that without God, man does not know which way to go.”

“Physicians should be concerned about protecting life.  Physicians are not just service machines for their patients.  They need to respect and give glory to God and recognize that man is not the ‘Lord of Life’ and physicians cannot be involved in providing abortion, euthanasia or contraception services to their patients.  All these things are against life.”

This next part really excited me. The CMA and discussions in Catholic bioethics is taking a huge step in the right direction by including Dr. Deisher as a speaker at their convention. She is the lead scientist in the SCPI Study on Aborted Fetal DNA in Vaccines Presented at International Meeting for Autism Research.

“Dr. Theresa Deisher… said the vast majority of drugs, vaccines and designer-genes are produced using voluntarily aborted babies during their research and development.  Over 20 vaccines parents give to the children contain the DNA cell lines from electively aborted babies, with no pro-life alternatives even available in the United States.”

“Even more horrific, Dr. Deisher said scores of companies license a cell line known as “PerC6” which was derived from an electively aborted baby at 18 weeks and “was pre-chosen and specifically isolated to be modified for vaccine, biologic and gene production.” (emphasis mine)

“In 2009 here in Seattle the University of Washington fulfilled 4,400 requests for fetal tissue and cell lines derived from voluntarily aborted babies…could mean nearly two million requests for fetal tissue and cell lines from aborted babies each year to be used for medical research.”

As Mark points out, don’t turn up your nose and think you are not affected by this in some way:

“If you have been vaccinated in the last 20 years, there is a 90 percent chance you have residual DNA in your body from an electively aborted baby in your body.   And this injustice continues despite a plea from the Pontifical Academy of Life over five years ago.”

The thought of vaccines today made from babies who were aborted decades ago is sometimes a little too much for people to digest. But it is the truth and a truth we can no longer conveniently ignore for the sake of the ‘common good’.

Unfortunately, despite the Pontifical Academy for Life’s support of a parent’s right to refuse these vaccines in their Moral Reflections on Vaccines Prepared From Cells Derived From Aborted Human Fetuses in 2005, many are still confused about this issue and continue to refuse parents their right of religious exemption to state-mandated vaccines, even for these aborted-fetal vaccines.

Due to what I call pure sloth and convenient ignorance, certain people fail to read through that document in its entirety and choose instead to base their decisions and opinions on this issue on incomplete science and on out-of-context and incomplete excerpts from this study; namely on the concern over the rubella vaccine (derived from aborted-fetal tissue) and congenital rubella syndrome.

There was a severe rubella epidemic in the early 1960s that caused more than 11,000 fetal deaths. Since then, congenital rubella syndrome has now been nearly eradicated from the United States since 2005 there is no threat to the ‘common good’ or to pregnant women from those unvaccinated for rubella.    

A pregnant woman is tested at her first doctor visit for rubella immunity.  If she is not immune, she can take a rubella immune globulin (IGIM) shot which is a series of antibodies that help boost immunity to certain diseases with no risk to the baby. If a pregnant woman refuses to protect herself, it is she who poses a risk to her unborn child – not the unvaccinated few. 

Furthermore, there are far more reported cases of adverse reactions to the rubella vaccine than there are actual cases of congenital rubella syndrome. Since the safety of the vaccine is an issue, parents have no moral or social obligation whatsoever to put their own children at risk for the so called “good of society”.

 The irony: Parents are being told to vaccinate their kids to prevent congenital rubella syndrome in unborn babies of pregnant women using cell tissue from babies who’d been aborted years ago and now there’s a chance that those aborted babies’ DNA is mixing with other innocent children’s DNA and possibly causing autism.  

The Chicken pox vaccine is also made from cells derived from aborted human tissue. A mother who has been vaccinated as a child will not possess sufficient antibodies in order to pass on the needed protection for her baby. Infants cannot receive the vaccine and if they contract the virus without that maternal antibody protection, they are at a high risk of death. This vaccine poses more of a risk to a pregnant woman and her unborn baby than an unvaccinated child could.

Merck’s own package insert  for the chicken pox vaccine warns that vaccine recipients should avoid contact with immune compromised people – including pregnant women – for up to 6 weeks after being vaccinated yet there are no laws or school policies that enforce this.

The common good concerns the life of all. The order of things must be subordinate to the order of persons, and not the other way around. It is understandable that many are concerned about the resurgence of rubella (and other eradicated communicable diseases) if Catholics or a whole population stopped vaccinating. However, in the United States abstaining from these vaccines can be done without causing significant harm to other children or indirectly the population as a whole.  

Once the proportion of the population that is immune exceeds the herd immunity level for the disease, the disease can no longer present serious problems in the population. Herd immunity levels for vaccine-preventable diseases are set on average between 75%-94%. A sustained increase in religious exemptions of 30% over 5 years would need to occur before these numbers began to change but they still would remain within the CDC standards. As long as vaccines are mandated and as long as the vaccine manufactures continue to sell their products through incentive-based marketing methods, the herd immunity levels based on the number of those vaccinating will never drop to unsafe levels.

Parents who, guided by their religious faith and properly formed conscience, refuse vaccination and wish to exempt their children from state-mandated vaccines due to the moral implications (no matter how remote) of these aborted-fetal vaccines or even due to the risk of evidence-based adverse effects to any and all vaccines, have a valid and even religiously-based moral reason to do so. Catholic physicians and Catholic Bishops MUST respect allow and SUPPORT parents wishing to do this. They should be at the front lines fighting for us and not against us.

Share

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »